
Ayoub Khote
Philosophically Deviant
Occupation: IT Manager, Writer, Photographer
Location: Leicester, England
His ProfilesRankThis is the rank of 'Ayoub Khote' out of all Google+ Profiles.: 1,094 (GenderRankFor the gender 'Men'.: 616)
His ProfilesRankThis is the rank of 'Ayoub Khote' out of all Google+ Profiles. in United Kingdom: 23 (GenderRankFor the gender 'Men'.: 11)
Followers: 59,917
Following: 3,855
Added to CircleCount.com: 07/13/2011That's the date, where Ayoub Khote has been indexed by CircleCount.com.
This hasn't to be the date where the daily check has been started. (Update nowYou can update your stats by clicking on this link!
This can take a few seconds.)
Ayoub Khote was in following circles
Activity
Average numbers for the latest postings:
11 comments per posting'Current posts' means the last 50 posts that are at the most 4 weeks old. So this metric gives a picture of how many comments someone has received recently.
2 reshares per posting'Current posts' means the last 50 posts that are at the most 4 weeks old. So this metric gives a picture of .how often someone's posts have been reshared lately.
16 +1's per posting'Current posts' means the last 50 posts that are at the most 4 weeks old. So this metric gives a picture of how many +1's someone has received on his or her posts recently.
1,231 characters per posting'Current posts' means the last 50 posts that are at the most 4 weeks old. So this metric gives a picture of how many characters someone has used per post recently.
Latest postings

2013-05-18 11:18:38 (15 comments, 1 reshares, 29 +1s)
Giggles
Yes, it would have made Physics so much more enjoyable!!!
Via: Ryan B.
#giggles


2013-05-18 10:49:15 (14 comments, 1 reshares, 18 +1s)
Why the new Google+ rocks for writers.
Some writers are less than gruntled about Google+'s new design. Here's why they should love it.
The complaint goes like this: The new Google+ emphasizes pictures and de-emphasizes words, which is a Pinterest-like move that panders to non-readers and disadvantages the word people.
This whole argument is false, and here's why:
Falsehood #1: You need a lot of words, not a picture, to promote writing.
It's false because that's how the most successful books are promoted: with pictures, not a wall of words. Ask any book jacket designer.
Falsehood #2: A "card" doesn't have enough information to convey what's in a written work.
In fact, that's how libraries were organized for centuries -- with a catalog of cards.
