Login now

Not your profile? Login and get free access to your reports and analysis.

Tags

Sign in

No tag added here yet.
You can login on CircleCount to add some tags here.

Are you missing a tag in the list of available tags? You can suggest new tags here.

Login now

Do you want to see a more detailed chart? Check your settings and define your favorite chart type.

Or click here to get the detailed chart only once.

Shared Circles including Marc Murison

Shared Circles are not available on Google+ anymore, but you can find them still here.

Top posts in the last 50 posts

Most comments: 3

2013-02-08 15:59:30 (3 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Is there a working PPA?

Most reshares: 2

posted image

2012-07-08 18:32:07 (1 comments, 2 reshares, 1 +1s)Open 

The Standard Model of particle physics: Years from concept to discovery. (Source: +The Economist) 

Most plusones: 7

posted image

2012-07-22 06:52:51 (1 comments, 1 reshares, 7 +1s)Open 

Latest 50 posts

posted image

2015-01-09 16:11:39 (2 comments, 0 reshares, 1 +1s)Open 

Silly Walk Clock

Silly Walk Clock___

posted image

2014-03-15 19:17:09 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2013-10-22 06:30:06 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

2013-10-19 05:46:28 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2013-02-13 07:54:24 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 3 +1s)Open 

Moon, Mercury, and Mars this evening.

Moon, Mercury, and Mars this evening.___

posted image

2013-02-11 22:53:02 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Astonishing. Nothing ever really changes, does it? Rove, Atwater, Nixon's Ratfuckers -- they were all babes in the woods compared to Baxter and Whitaker.

Astonishing. Nothing ever really changes, does it? Rove, Atwater, Nixon's Ratfuckers -- they were all babes in the woods compared to Baxter and Whitaker.___

posted image

2013-02-09 18:11:11 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 2 +1s)Open 

"As February unfolds, Mercury will rise higher in the sunset sky, brightening as it ascends.  From February 11th through 21st, the "pink planet" will be visible for as much as an hour after sunset.  February 11th is a date of special interest: a slender crescent Moon will appear straight above Mercury"

"As February unfolds, Mercury will rise higher in the sunset sky, brightening as it ascends.  From February 11th through 21st, the "pink planet" will be visible for as much as an hour after sunset.  February 11th is a date of special interest: a slender crescent Moon will appear straight above Mercury"___

2013-02-08 15:59:30 (3 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Is there a working PPA?

Is there a working PPA?___

posted image

2013-02-02 05:44:14 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Gorgeous. View it in full screen.

Gorgeous. View it in full screen.___

posted image

2012-09-17 17:51:05 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-08-14 15:57:25 (1 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

A bit over the top, but, damn, this is an insane accomplishment!

A bit over the top, but, damn, this is an insane accomplishment!___

posted image

2012-07-22 06:52:51 (1 comments, 1 reshares, 7 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-07-08 18:32:07 (1 comments, 2 reshares, 1 +1s)Open 

The Standard Model of particle physics: Years from concept to discovery. (Source: +The Economist) 

The Standard Model of particle physics: Years from concept to discovery. (Source: +The Economist) ___

2012-06-29 19:36:16 (2 comments, 0 reshares, 2 +1s)Open 

Science Friday!  A new analysis conclusively proves that we did it. Case very firmly closed. The article's Figure 3 is unambiguous: the ocean warming signal due solely to anthropogenic warming (i.e., the natural variations have been accounted for and removed) rises significantly above the noise level by ~1980.

This doesn't mean we've known conclusively since 1980 that we are wrecking our planet's climate (although climatologists had their suspicions even back then). It means that, with the quality of the data (three separate datasets) we have on hand in 2012, we can calculate and project signal to noise ratios going back in time to determine the time at which the signal rises unambiguously above the observational noise. (The more data you collect, the better your ability to discriminate signal from noise.) That time is around 1980. As more data gets collected, the date by... more »

Science Friday!  A new analysis conclusively proves that we did it. Case very firmly closed. The article's Figure 3 is unambiguous: the ocean warming signal due solely to anthropogenic warming (i.e., the natural variations have been accounted for and removed) rises significantly above the noise level by ~1980.

This doesn't mean we've known conclusively since 1980 that we are wrecking our planet's climate (although climatologists had their suspicions even back then). It means that, with the quality of the data (three separate datasets) we have on hand in 2012, we can calculate and project signal to noise ratios going back in time to determine the time at which the signal rises unambiguously above the observational noise. (The more data you collect, the better your ability to discriminate signal from noise.) That time is around 1980. As more data gets collected, the date by which we can unambiguously detect the anthropogenic signal in ocean warming will recede further.___

posted image

2012-06-26 23:15:13 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

M101.

M101.___

posted image

2012-06-20 15:31:20 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 1 +1s)Open 

Happy Summer Solstice! (4:09 pm MST)

Happy Summer Solstice! (4:09 pm MST)___

posted image

2012-06-16 19:44:50 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 1 +1s)Open 

Transit of Venus, a bit before second contact. Look closely and you can see sunlight refracting through the atmosphere of Venus (bridging the gap at the solar limb).

Transit of Venus, a bit before second contact. Look closely and you can see sunlight refracting through the atmosphere of Venus (bridging the gap at the solar limb).___

posted image

2012-06-16 19:43:04 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 2 +1s)Open 

Transit of Venus. With sunspots. In focus.

Transit of Venus. With sunspots. In focus.___

posted image

2012-06-16 17:59:01 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-06-16 17:15:44 (1 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-06-09 19:35:10 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-06-09 19:00:19 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-05-22 19:54:03 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-05-22 19:53:26 (1 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-05-22 19:53:09 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-05-22 19:52:44 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-05-17 04:43:03 (0 comments, 1 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-05-15 15:27:30 (1 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Dang.

Dang.___

posted image

2012-05-13 20:16:44 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-05-06 04:18:41 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-04-29 16:01:25 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

#SacrilegiousSunday

#SacrilegiousSunday___

posted image

2012-04-20 06:55:20 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Okay, these are pretty adorable.

Okay, these are pretty adorable.___

posted image

2012-04-15 16:29:42 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 3 +1s)Open 

Yet again, the religious right -- which, near as I can tell, at least by their rhetoric, and certainly by their policy positions, is currently synonymous with the right wing -- flatly denies reality and willfully takes up an alternate fantasy world. Behaving like idiots never seems to faze them in the least. So the questions are why do simple fact-based conclusions to the contrary only strengthen their delusional devotion to a regressive and punishing ideology, and what can the reality-based community do about this endemic blight on American society?

"What these [right wing] reactions make clear is that no evidence — whether it’s on the benefits of making contraception widely accessible or the positive impact of comprehensive sex ed — will stop the war on sex."

Yet again, the religious right -- which, near as I can tell, at least by their rhetoric, and certainly by their policy positions, is currently synonymous with the right wing -- flatly denies reality and willfully takes up an alternate fantasy world. Behaving like idiots never seems to faze them in the least. So the questions are why do simple fact-based conclusions to the contrary only strengthen their delusional devotion to a regressive and punishing ideology, and what can the reality-based community do about this endemic blight on American society?

"What these [right wing] reactions make clear is that no evidence — whether it’s on the benefits of making contraception widely accessible or the positive impact of comprehensive sex ed — will stop the war on sex."___

posted image

2012-04-04 23:36:53 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

The video is tres cool.

The video is tres cool.___

posted image

2012-04-04 07:34:00 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

More of Chris Mooney getting it right.

More of Chris Mooney getting it right.___

posted image

2012-04-02 20:42:52 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Beautiful images, beautiful prose.

Beautiful images, beautiful prose.___

posted image

2012-03-28 06:08:23 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 1 +1s)Open 

Science Wednesday!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%E2%80%99s_theorem

Science Wednesday!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%E2%80%99s_theorem___

posted image

2012-03-27 21:14:03 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-03-26 17:19:25 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2012-03-24 03:31:04 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Apparently, it's way worse than anybody thought. The NSA is completely free of all accountability, ignoring the Constitution (who doesn't these days?) and every applicable law.

Apparently, it's way worse than anybody thought. The NSA is completely free of all accountability, ignoring the Constitution (who doesn't these days?) and every applicable law.___

posted image

2012-03-22 18:54:14 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Independent evidence that the OPERA superluminal neutrino result is, as expected, erroneous.

Independent evidence that the OPERA superluminal neutrino result is, as expected, erroneous.___

posted image

2012-03-16 17:45:23 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Anti-Science Friday!
Arizona Republicans are set to completely deregulate electronic billboards by annulling a law already on the books that bans them. If any of you have ever seen these, you know they're horribly bright and a danger to motorists, among other things.

Anti-Science Friday!
Arizona Republicans are set to completely deregulate electronic billboards by annulling a law already on the books that bans them. If any of you have ever seen these, you know they're horribly bright and a danger to motorists, among other things.___

posted image

2011-11-04 23:47:57 (0 comments, 1 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

And now for something completely different. Drum sets aren't normally my rhythmic cup of tea, but this is . . . fascinating.

And now for something completely different. Drum sets aren't normally my rhythmic cup of tea, but this is . . . fascinating.___

posted image

2011-11-04 22:47:43 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 1 +1s)Open 

Science Friday!

Science Friday!___

posted image

2011-11-04 19:22:13 (0 comments, 1 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Power to the People!

Power to the People!___

posted image

2011-11-04 00:32:02 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Well, no, highly unlikely. But the neat thing about this is the civilized, evidence-based manner in which the various heated arguments around the controversy are playing out: everybody wants most of all to find out what's behind the measured effect. Is it really a fundamental mind-bender, or is it systematic error? The latter is way more likely, but either way we learn new things. This is how science works. The current stage of this particular controversy is a snapshot of the scientific method in its phase of self-correcting. That self-correcting nature is one of the fundamental reasons why the scientific method works.

Well, no, highly unlikely. But the neat thing about this is the civilized, evidence-based manner in which the various heated arguments around the controversy are playing out: everybody wants most of all to find out what's behind the measured effect. Is it really a fundamental mind-bender, or is it systematic error? The latter is way more likely, but either way we learn new things. This is how science works. The current stage of this particular controversy is a snapshot of the scientific method in its phase of self-correcting. That self-correcting nature is one of the fundamental reasons why the scientific method works.___

posted image

2011-11-02 19:41:35 (0 comments, 1 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2011-11-02 19:27:42 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2011-11-02 06:24:27 (0 comments, 2 reshares, 1 +1s)Open 

___

posted image

2011-11-01 21:23:20 (0 comments, 0 reshares, 0 +1s)Open 

Dear diary,

Dear diary,___

Buttons

A special service of CircleCount.com is the following button.

The button shows the number of followers you have directly in a small button. You can add this button to your website, like the +1-Button of Google or the Like-Button of Facebook.






You can add this button directly in your website. For more information about the CircleCount Buttons and the description how to add them to another page click here.

Marc MurisonFacebookCircloscope